Dishonour of Cheque/ Cheque Bouncing: Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

UPDATED: Mr. Ramanbhai Mathurbhai Patel vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Cr. Writ Petition No. 2362/2014 (Bombay High Court, August 25, 2014) which discusses the landmark Dashrath Singh judgment delivered by Supreme Court on August 1, 2014.

CASE LIST

Prosecution based on second or successive dishonour of cheque shall be permissible.
Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Bouncing Case
  • K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510
  • Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd., (2001) 3 SCC 609
  • Harman Electronics Pvt.Ltd. v. National Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., (2009) 1 SCC 720
  • Dashrath Rupsingh Rathore vs. State of Maharashtra, MANU/SC/0655/2014 (Supreme Court, August 1, 2014) [Summary] [Full Text
  • Mr.Ramanbhai Mathurbhai Patel vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Cr. Writ Petition No. 2362/2014 (Bombay High Court, August 25, 2014) [Full Text]
The period of six months provided in Section 138 (a) of the Act excludes the first day of drawl and includes the last day of the sixth month.

View original post 13 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s